Subject | Re: FB 1.5 vs. Win2003 + Xeon |
---|---|
Author | Adam |
Post date | 2006-06-06T23:26:27Z |
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, afarias.sistemas
<afarias.sistemas@...> wrote:
service after making the change), then that won't be your problem.
What does '[very] bad performances' mean? Is FBServer CPU bound / IO
Bound / not getting a chance to run because the server is also running
X, Y and Z?
What is the file extension? Are you using (drive) shadowing?
Adam
<afarias.sistemas@...> wrote:
>over a
> Hi All,
>
> Is there any known issue on using FB 1.5 SS on Windows 2003 server
> Xeon (HT) Processor??(tested 2
>
> I have experienced [very] bad performances with this configuration
> diferent applications, on 2 diferent servers, one being a 4processor server
> and a second one a 1 processor only)Well if you have already set the CPU affinity (and restarted the
>
> On the 4 processor machine we´ve attached FB to the 1st processor on
> firebird.conf.
service after making the change), then that won't be your problem.
What does '[very] bad performances' mean? Is FBServer CPU bound / IO
Bound / not getting a chance to run because the server is also running
X, Y and Z?
What is the file extension? Are you using (drive) shadowing?
Adam