Subject | Re: [firebird-support] DDL not "entirely" under transactional control? |
---|---|
Author | Martijn Tonies |
Post date | 2006-05-21T16:11:06Z |
If Firebird doesn't support DML on an uncommitted piece of
DDL, it should throw an exception.
Martijn Tonies
Database Workbench - development tool for Firebird and more!
Upscene Productions
http://www.upscene.com
My thoughts:
http://blog.upscene.com/martijn/
Database development questions? Check the forum!
http://www.databasedevelopmentforum.com
DDL, it should throw an exception.
Martijn Tonies
Database Workbench - development tool for Firebird and more!
Upscene Productions
http://www.upscene.com
My thoughts:
http://blog.upscene.com/martijn/
Database development questions? Check the forum!
http://www.databasedevelopmentforum.com
> > You
> > really need to abandon all those precepts you're bringing to your
> > Firebird experience from "databases" that are really just physical
> > tables will bells and whistles. :-)
>
>Ooh, I'd say DB2's a little more than "physical tables with bells and
>whistles"... Still, I'll try to avoid wandering off-topic to defend my
>"other" favorite database ;-)