--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, "Sysdev/Paulo Botelho"
<sysdev@...> wrote:

>
> To Save licence costs, keeping perfomance, why not a Linux box as

dedicated

> Database Server ?

Because I have no idea about Linux ;-)
Even not enough to offer a Linux machine to one of my custumers that i
can't support. And in one message they talk about some strange
performance problems with Firebird and Linux.
So i better go the safe way...

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "olaf_bredv" <olaf_bredv@...>
> To: <firebird-support@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 8:51 AM
> Subject: [firebird-support] max connections on Windows XP Pro?
>
>
> > I'm planning to outsource 3 Firebird 1.5 Databases from an Windows
> > 2000 Server to a new PC as dedicated Database Server. If I use Windows
> > XP Pro on the new system (sure to save licence costs), is it possible
> > to get performance problems because of the count of clients?
> > There are 7 clients with 5 connections to 3 Databases on each machine.
> > Can anybody tell me: will the performance be slower if i use Windows
> > XP pro as if I use Windows 2003 Server for that machine ?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >
> > Visit http://firebird.sourceforge.net and click the Resources item
> > on the main (top) menu. Try Knowledgebase and FAQ links !
> >
> > Also search the knowledgebases at http://www.ibphoenix.com
> >
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>