Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Firebird vs Postgres |
---|---|
Author | Richard Wesley |
Post date | 2006-12-21T00:20:36Z |
On Dec 20, 2006, at 07:38, heineferreira wrote:
them
- Firebird has much better collation support - down to the column
level.
- Postgres is faster, and is not nearly as sensitive to indexing
- Postgres has a much richer built in function set.
- Firebird is embeddable and file-based.
HTH,
________________________________________________________
Richard Wesley Senior Software Developer Tableau
Software
Visit: http://www.trytableau.com/now.html
> How does Firebird compare to Postgresql?Some things I have observed writing a connectivity layer for both of
> I have downloaded both database systems and would like to know
> the advantages and disadvantages of both.
> I read somewhere on the internet that Postgres needs vast amounts of
> ram for big databases. A friend of mine says that he runs 30gb
> databases on entry level pc's. The reason why I want to compare the
> two is because they are the only databasis that are 100% open source
> and free for commercial use. From what I could gather it looks like
> Postgresql comes with quite a good and free database administration
> tool. It seems however that FlameRobin is very basic and is still in
> 0.75 release.
them
- Firebird has much better collation support - down to the column
level.
- Postgres is faster, and is not nearly as sensitive to indexing
- Postgres has a much richer built in function set.
- Firebird is embeddable and file-based.
HTH,
________________________________________________________
Richard Wesley Senior Software Developer Tableau
Software
Visit: http://www.trytableau.com/now.html