Subject | Re: [firebird-support] default value |
---|---|
Author | Paul Vinkenoog |
Post date | 2006-12-21T00:02:52Z |
Ivan Prenosil wrote:
consider to change isql's behaviour here (and maybe even the default
engine behaviour), because this keeps causing people trouble. If
something is null, it should be reported as null, *especially* in NOT
NULL fields, so the user knows he has to do something about it.
new Null Guide :-)
Greetings,
Paul Vinkenoog
> For each field, application reads separately its value andThanks, that explains everything. I think we should definitely
> null-flag. The null flag is read only when application asks for it.
> The default behavior (specified in xsqlda during prepare) is that
> null flag is not read for Not Null fields (the rule is a bit more
> complex), but there is no problem for application to ask null flag
> always.
consider to change isql's behaviour here (and maybe even the default
engine behaviour), because this keeps causing people trouble. If
something is null, it should be reported as null, *especially* in NOT
NULL fields, so the user knows he has to do something about it.
> You can try FSQL tool from this siteVery good. You just earned yourself - and FSQL - a luxury seat in the
> http://www.volny.cz/iprenosil/interbase/
> it will show null state correctly.
new Null Guide :-)
Greetings,
Paul Vinkenoog