Subject | RE: [firebird-support] Bad indexes - expected 7 encountered 5 - Classic |
---|---|
Author | Bob Murdoch |
Post date | 2006-12-15T00:18:03Z |
Ann,
of database disconnects, and unfortunately we do not log this type of
activity.
However, within a single transaction we will delete between 10k - 70k
rows, and insert nearly the same amount. Most likely, 80-90% of the
newly inserted rows are duplicates of the just-deleted rows.
Bob M..
> -----Original Message-----I'm not sure about the crashes. Our systems are built to be tolerant
> From: Ann W. Harrison [mailto:aharrison@...]
> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 5:52 PM
>
> Vlad has done some interesting examination of the
> index handling code and offered a second possible
> explanation of these errors.
>
> My theory requires that the server or at least one
> of server processes crash. Without crashes, my
> theoretical problem can't occur.
>
> Vlad's theory requires that entries be removed and
> inserted in the same value range to the extend that
> an index page first splits and is then recombined.
>
>
> So, for those of you who have highly concurrent
> applications running 1.5.3 Classic and are seeing
> occasional corrupt indexes with a wrong page type
> in the index (expected 7 encountered 5) - do your
> environments resemble either of these?
of database disconnects, and unfortunately we do not log this type of
activity.
However, within a single transaction we will delete between 10k - 70k
rows, and insert nearly the same amount. Most likely, 80-90% of the
newly inserted rows are duplicates of the just-deleted rows.
Bob M..