Hello guys, I still have no response from anyone, is it so strange? Doesn't
anybody have faced similar problem?



Thank you in advance

Dennis



_____

From: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Dennis
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 10:28 AM
To: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [firebird-support] Issue: deadlock with Firebird and Delphi.
ref/eDN7002040583



Dear all

I have made this test: there is small application that on its start up
updates the same record (with the same keys). When I call this application
instantly several times, for instance 15 times in less than 1/10second, some
of these applications, about 4, occur the deadlock conflict error on non
wait transaction.

At first sight, this is logical because some of them didn't commit yet, so
there are deadlock really, the problem is that using the follow retry loop
these launches cannot post even if the record became unlocked, even if all
other application / launches are terminated!

The retry loop is like this:

Usercancel:=false;

Repeat

Try

Post;

Ok:=true;

Except

If Dialog('retry?')=no then usercancel:=true;

Ok:=false;

End; // except

Until ok or usercancel.

If ok then commit;

Transaction settings:

read_committed

rec_version

nowait

Error:

lock conflict on no wait transaction

deadlock

update conflicts with concurrent update

Note 1:

In case where some applications cannot post because of deadlock, if I call
again the application (one more time), the new launch it updates the
database with no error!!!

Note 2:

I produced the error by my own, leaving from other application the record
edited and uncommitted, the deadlock error occurred on tested application,
the loop worked as well, when I committed the transaction from the other
application, the loop posted the record and finally committed the
transaction, so the loop is working.

The fact is, an update with deadlock error, sometimes cannot be always
posted even if the record become unlocked from the other application. This
is not logical, where is the error?

Please share your thoughts.

Kind regards

Dennis

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]