| Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Re: FireBird 2: Max length of names for tables, fields, constraints, etc |
|---|---|
| Author | Ann W. Harrison |
| Post date | 2006-11-26T18:24:07Z |
Bogusław Brandys wrote:
32 to 40 bits. According to my formula, that would allow you to
store 159,758,099,725 records that compress to 100 bytes. You'd
get more smaller records and fewer larger records.
Regards,
Ann
>Well, the size of the record number portion of the db_key went from
> By the way: I'd like to ask what is the current limit of single table
> size in Firebird 2.0 database ?
>
32 to 40 bits. According to my formula, that would allow you to
store 159,758,099,725 records that compress to 100 bytes. You'd
get more smaller records and fewer larger records.
Regards,
Ann