Subject Re: [firebird-support] Re: FireBird 2: Max length of names for tables, fields, constraints, etc
Author Bogusław Brandys
Nols Smit wrote:
>
>
> Thanks for the replies. The reason why I'm asked the question:
>
> I stumbled across Django (http://www.djangoproject.com/
> <http://www.djangoproject.com/>).
>
> Django was developed at World Online, the Web department of a newspaper
> in Lawrence, Kansas, USA.
>
> Quoted from their FAQS (http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/faq/
> <http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/faq/>)
> "World Online has been using Django for more than three years. Sites
> built on Django have weathered traffic spikes of over one million hits
> an hour and a number of Slashdottings. Yes, it's quite stable."
>
> But it seems it's bounded to the build-in SQLite 3, PostgreSQL and MySQL
> (where's my pack of Valoid).
>
> According to this posting (http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/1261
> <http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/1261>), the max. length of 31
> chars for table names, etc. is the problem why FireBird can't be used.
>
> Regards,
>
> Nols Smit
>

By the way: I'd like to ask what is the current limit of single table
size in Firebird 2.0 database ?


Best regards
Boguslaw