Subject | Re: Intel Core 2 |
---|---|
Author | Anderson Farias |
Post date | 2006-11-23T15:15:03Z |
My experience is that CS works *a lot better* than SS on SMP machines
(with my apps in particular).
We have an app (kind of a small ERP), 1Gb DB and at least 200
concurrent connections (reporting/updates) with FB running on a
Windows 2003 with 4 Xeon processors. We tryed 1st SS (our usual
install) 'tied' to 1 processor and than moved to CS wich performed *a
lot* better.
Even with smaller apps (few records (200MB db) and with about 10 to 20
concurrent users only) we have experienced better performances using
CS over SS on machines with 2 or 4 processors.
Regards,
Anderson
(with my apps in particular).
We have an app (kind of a small ERP), 1Gb DB and at least 200
concurrent connections (reporting/updates) with FB running on a
Windows 2003 with 4 Xeon processors. We tryed 1st SS (our usual
install) 'tied' to 1 processor and than moved to CS wich performed *a
lot* better.
Even with smaller apps (few records (200MB db) and with about 10 to 20
concurrent users only) we have experienced better performances using
CS over SS on machines with 2 or 4 processors.
Regards,
Anderson