| Subject | Re: Intel Core 2 |
|---|---|
| Author | Adam |
| Post date | 2006-11-22T22:49:22Z |
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, "werthlouis" <louis@...> wrote:
on an 4 x Xeon (dual core) server and it does the job quite well.
Although it only uses 1 of the 8 cores, the shared cache allows it to
work. I am considering installing CS on that machine when the customer
starts to do more analytical reporting that can clog up SS.
If there is heavy queries, use classic, otherwise stick with the
shared cache of SS.
Adam
>Well it isn't able to take advantage of multiple, we have SS running
> Hi
>
> What gould be the best implementation of firebird on a Intel Core 2
> 2.13GHtz, 2Gig Mem and 2 x 150gig serial ata 2 HDD for optimum use with
> this hardware architecture. Classic or Superserver.
>
> I understand that the Superserver architecture does not support multi
> processor.
on an 4 x Xeon (dual core) server and it does the job quite well.
Although it only uses 1 of the 8 cores, the shared cache allows it to
work. I am considering installing CS on that machine when the customer
starts to do more analytical reporting that can clog up SS.
>Your other core can still be used by ASTA or other Windows services.
> I am using FB 1.53, approx 10gig Database file. Database used in
> conjunction with ASTA middle tier with 10 pooled sessions into FB.
> WinXPPro SP2
>
If there is heavy queries, use classic, otherwise stick with the
shared cache of SS.
Adam