|Subject||Re: Strange behaviour in Firebird 188.8.131.5270|
--- In email@example.com, Nando Dessena <nando@...> wrote:
>Thanks for your reply!
> j> More simply it could be a firebird bug!
> it's rather an incomplete support for SQL aliases, and it's more or
> less documented. Your example works fine and produces the expected
> result in Fb 2.
> H> What is the parser supposed to deduce if you
> H> duplicate the table name as its alias?
> aliases hide table names. They didn't do that always in Fb 1.x. The
> parser ain't able to distinguish a dumb alias from a smart one. :-)
> Nando Dessena
> I support Firebird, I am a Firebird Foundation member!
> Join today at http://www.firebirdsql.org/ff/foundation