Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Re: Strange behaviour in Firebird 1.5.3.4870 |
---|---|
Author | Nando Dessena |
Post date | 2006-10-05T13:24:44Z |
Jack,
j> More simply it could be a firebird bug!
it's rather an incomplete support for SQL aliases, and it's more or
less documented. Your example works fine and produces the expected
result in Fb 2.
Helen,
H> What is the parser supposed to deduce if you
H> duplicate the table name as its alias?
aliases hide table names. They didn't do that always in Fb 1.x. The
parser ain't able to distinguish a dumb alias from a smart one. :-)
Ciao
--
Nando Dessena
======================================================
I support Firebird, I am a Firebird Foundation member!
Join today at http://www.firebirdsql.org/ff/foundation
======================================================
j> More simply it could be a firebird bug!
it's rather an incomplete support for SQL aliases, and it's more or
less documented. Your example works fine and produces the expected
result in Fb 2.
Helen,
H> What is the parser supposed to deduce if you
H> duplicate the table name as its alias?
aliases hide table names. They didn't do that always in Fb 1.x. The
parser ain't able to distinguish a dumb alias from a smart one. :-)
Ciao
--
Nando Dessena
======================================================
I support Firebird, I am a Firebird Foundation member!
Join today at http://www.firebirdsql.org/ff/foundation
======================================================