Subject Re: [firebird-support] Re: Basic tests shows very poor performance
Author grostoon
Ok, Federico. I did not use MySQL 4 or > because the redhat 9 I'm using for this test
has mysql 3.23 installed and I felt it was sufficient for this purpose. My goal is not to use
postgres, mysql or anything else. I made my decision : it will be FB for all it's advantages I described above in a reply to Ann W. Harrisson.
But I'm quite novice to FB and I was quite surprised by the response time when I did this stupid test, that's all.

Toon.


Federico Tello Gentile <fgentile@...> wrote:
grostoon wrote:
> Come on boy, it's a typo of course, it's mysql 3.23, not 2.23 !
> Do you think I'm that stupid ?

I knew it was 3.23, 2.23 is not something I think can be downloaded
anymore. But why not use mysql 4.something? Or even test the new 5.0 RC
that is there to test?
I think that even if you find MySQL 3.23 twice as fast as the other
options, the lack of features would make you doubt using it.


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Visit http://firebird.sourceforge.net and click the Resources item
on the main (top) menu. Try Knowledgebase and FAQ links !

Also search the knowledgebases at http://www.ibphoenix.com

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++




SPONSORED LINKS
Technical support Computer technical support Compaq computer technical support Compaq technical support Hewlett packard technical support Microsoft technical support

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "firebird-support" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
firebird-support-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------




---------------------------------
Yahoo! for Good
Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]