Hi Paul,

As I wrote, I did the test with isql with direct connect to the DB file, not through fb_inet_server for FB1.53 as well as for FB2.0.
I still think that something was changed between FB1.5 and FB2.0 to explain such a difference : why does it take just a few seconds for FB2 where it takes 2430 s for FB1.5 ?

BTW, I've just testing it and setting the sweep interval to 0 does not change anything for both FB1.5 and FB2.0.

BTW: did you have time to test my AIX build a bit ?

Regards,

Toon.


Paul Beach <pbeach@...> wrote:

> Can we convince the powers that be to delegate GC to its own thread? or
> does Firebird GC depend on "owning" the system?

I believe the tests are being run on classic, so he is seeing co-op garabage
collection rather than the work being done in a GC thread...
Remember Classic doesn't do threads.

I say this because Toon, just built a 1.5.3 AIX server for Classic...
So it would be interesting to know which of the Firebird Server Architectures
are being compared to the other databases.

Paul



++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Visit http://firebird.sourceforge.net and click the Resources item
on the main (top) menu. Try Knowledgebase and FAQ links !

Also search the knowledgebases at http://www.ibphoenix.com

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++




SPONSORED LINKS
Technical support Computer technical support Compaq computer technical support Compaq technical support Hewlett packard technical support Microsoft technical support

---------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS


Visit your group "firebird-support" on the web.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
firebird-support-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


---------------------------------




---------------------------------
Yahoo! for Good
Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]