Subject | Re: [firebird-support] How "Experimental" is FB 1.5.2 Classic for Windows Now? |
---|---|
Author | Alexandre Benson Smith |
Post date | 2005-09-24T01:09:21Z |
ianbillups wrote:
Classic IS stable under windows. the experimental was a word choosen to
advice to a few edges left. That was true for 1.5.0 not for 1.5.2.
If you look in the list archives you will find a more detailed explanation.
see you !
--
Alexandre Benson Smith
Development
THOR Software e Comercial Ltda.
Santo Andre - Sao Paulo - Brazil
www.thorsoftware.com.br
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.5/110 - Release Date: 22/09/2005
>Hi All,Ian,
>
>We've just moved a large ASP.NET system from MS SQL to FB. We run the
>database on multi-CPU Windows server, hence our choice of Classic.
>
>I read very carefully the "classic-or-super" page in the manual, which
>describes Classic as "somewhat experimental" under Windows.
>
>Is this still true of FB 1.5.2?
>
>Strangely, when I looked for a download of FB 1.5.3 RC1, the Windows
>Classic version seemed to be missing! Or did I miss something?
>
>Any help would be appreciated,
>
>Ian.
>
>
Classic IS stable under windows. the experimental was a word choosen to
advice to a few edges left. That was true for 1.5.0 not for 1.5.2.
If you look in the list archives you will find a more detailed explanation.
see you !
--
Alexandre Benson Smith
Development
THOR Software e Comercial Ltda.
Santo Andre - Sao Paulo - Brazil
www.thorsoftware.com.br
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.5/110 - Release Date: 22/09/2005