Subject | Re: Is FB 1.0.3 Faster on a RAID than on a single drive? |
---|---|
Author | Adam |
Post date | 2005-09-06T23:30:58Z |
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, "robert_difalco"
<rdifalco@t...> wrote:
physical control of the machine that is hosting the database. You can
put your database on a USB key if you like.
bound, so improving the I/O speed should speed it up. You probably
have some batch operation in mind that allows you could watch to
determine this. Hint, if the CPU is 100%, or close to, a faster
volume will not achieve much. If it is nearly idle and the disk is
sounding like a jet engine, then that sounds like a good candidate.
Adam
<rdifalco@t...> wrote:
> Does FB have any problems having it's data file on a RAID 5?No, the only rule is that the volume itself must be under the
physical control of the machine that is hosting the database. You can
put your database on a USB key if you like.
> MyIt really depends on the operation, but yes inserts tend to be I/O
> experience is that a database should be much faster with inserts and
> queries than with a single drive but I just wanted to make sure this
> was true for FB.
bound, so improving the I/O speed should speed it up. You probably
have some batch operation in mind that allows you could watch to
determine this. Hint, if the CPU is 100%, or close to, a faster
volume will not achieve much. If it is nearly idle and the disk is
sounding like a jet engine, then that sounds like a good candidate.
Adam