Subject | RE: [firebird-support] Interbase/Firebird with a SAN |
---|---|
Author | Steve Wiser |
Post date | 2005-08-30T18:31:02Z |
Hi Sean,
We would probably buy Dell stuff and according to their specifications
the iSCSI version of their SAN box only supports 2 servers. Their Fibre
channel one supports 8, though. So we were looking at Fibre Channel...
We want to buy 2 of the boxes and have them either mirror or just take
periodic snapshots. Right now we are either copying the data via nfs or
rsync over ssh through-out the network and it is starting to eat up a
lot of our bandwidth (we are also looking into just continuing our
current method of copying, but over a dedicated ethernet network). The
through-put is also important to us. Can 8 db servers really share one
SAN box and not overwhelm it?
We are still trying to work out the details (both technical and
budgetary), but I was hoping that maybe someone on this forum already
had one in place for their databases and could let me know if this thing
is going to work before I shell out the tens of thousands of dollars for
it. If it does work then it would be worth the cost for us.
Thanks,
Steve
We would probably buy Dell stuff and according to their specifications
the iSCSI version of their SAN box only supports 2 servers. Their Fibre
channel one supports 8, though. So we were looking at Fibre Channel...
We want to buy 2 of the boxes and have them either mirror or just take
periodic snapshots. Right now we are either copying the data via nfs or
rsync over ssh through-out the network and it is starting to eat up a
lot of our bandwidth (we are also looking into just continuing our
current method of copying, but over a dedicated ethernet network). The
through-put is also important to us. Can 8 db servers really share one
SAN box and not overwhelm it?
We are still trying to work out the details (both technical and
budgetary), but I was hoping that maybe someone on this forum already
had one in place for their databases and could let me know if this thing
is going to work before I shell out the tens of thousands of dollars for
it. If it does work then it would be worth the cost for us.
Thanks,
Steve
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 12:16 -0400, Leyne, Sean wrote:
> Steve,
>
> > We are thinking about starting off with a 3 TB SAN from Dell and
> > attaching it to 8 of our servers, but I would love to hear if anyone
> > else is doing this and if so how it is going, any pitfalls to avoid,
> > etc.
>
> SANs are a pet subject of mine, I've been working on my business
> partner
> to get one for 2 years but he keeps resisting.
>
> Are you looking at Fibre Channel or iSCSI connects?
>
> Unless you are going to be using 10Gb network cards/switches, Fibre
> Channel is the only way to go (unfortunately). Firebird, like all
> databases, is I/O bound so transfer speed is critical. Fibre Channel
> is
> currently the only way to get the throughput.
>
>
> Are you looking to use volume mirroring/replication?
>
> You will need to test if mirrors of the Firebird databases are valid
> if
> the host dies. Most HBAs should act exactly like a normal hard drive
> controller, and provide the correct disk write order, but you will
> need
> to test to be sure.
>
>
> Sean
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Visit http://firebird.sourceforge.net and click the Resources item
> on the main (top) menu. Try Knowledgebase and FAQ links !
>
> Also search the knowledgebases at http://www.ibphoenix.com
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]