Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Does Firebird offer any priority support? |
---|---|
Author | David Johnson |
Post date | 2005-08-15T11:27:55Z |
300Mb is, for all intents and purposes, an empty database. Now if it
were 300Gb ...
Like Nick says, take a snapshot with gbak and run you nasty queries
against the copy. That's how we handle this situation on a multi-
terabyte real-time database.
It's a common practice to separate your operations database from your
ad-hoc reporting database - ad-hoc queries are typically concerned with
the high level "as-of" questions, not the moment to moment decision
making, so being a few hours out of date is not a big deal.
Also, check your queries. I would be very suspicious of a query taking
30 minutes when there is so little data involved. Some creative
indexing may be all that you need.
were 300Gb ...
Like Nick says, take a snapshot with gbak and run you nasty queries
against the copy. That's how we handle this situation on a multi-
terabyte real-time database.
It's a common practice to separate your operations database from your
ad-hoc reporting database - ad-hoc queries are typically concerned with
the high level "as-of" questions, not the moment to moment decision
making, so being a few hours out of date is not a big deal.
Also, check your queries. I would be very suspicious of a query taking
30 minutes when there is so little data involved. Some creative
indexing may be all that you need.
On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 13:42 +0300, Ivaylo Spasov wrote:
> Unfortunately, all these queries must be executed on the same
> database,
> because it is changing fast and is too big (300mb) to be backed up
> too
> often.