Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Re: Max users in a big boomer of a server - Classic or SS |
---|---|
Author | Alexandre Benson Smith |
Post date | 2005-08-11T14:28:23Z |
Eduardo A. Salgado wrote:
I wanted to state that I had never deployed a system for 1000 concurrent
users, and the maximum that I had deployed are around 100-150 (but it's
not FB it's Oracle).
In FB I have a maximum of 30 concurrent users. In my case I don't need
to do anything special, since 30 is a low number of concurrent connections.
For a bigger number I think you should go to a 3-tier approach and
connection pooling.
this too (and are answering this thread ;-) )
--
Alexandre Benson Smith
Development
THOR Software e Comercial Ltda.
Santo Andre - Sao Paulo - Brazil
www.thorsoftware.com.br
>AlexandreSorry I was not clear...
>
>How are you doing your 100-150 concurrent users?
>
>
I wanted to state that I had never deployed a system for 1000 concurrent
users, and the maximum that I had deployed are around 100-150 (but it's
not FB it's Oracle).
In FB I have a maximum of 30 concurrent users. In my case I don't need
to do anything special, since 30 is a low number of concurrent connections.
For a bigger number I think you should go to a 3-tier approach and
connection pooling.
>I am quickly getting in beyond my pay grade ;-)look for messages of Dalton Calford, David Johnson have good insights on
>
>Were do I go to learn about large numbers like these?
>
>
>
this too (and are answering this thread ;-) )
>Feel like the dog chasing the bus. Now that we caught it ...see you !
>
>-Eduardo
>
>
--
Alexandre Benson Smith
Development
THOR Software e Comercial Ltda.
Santo Andre - Sao Paulo - Brazil
www.thorsoftware.com.br