Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Re: Max users in a big boomer of a server - Classic or SS |
---|---|
Author | Alexandre Benson Smith |
Post date | 2005-08-09T18:25:40Z |
Eduardo A. Salgado wrote:
I had never deployed a system for a thousand users, I think the maximum
I have are around 100-150 concurrent users.
I think, when you have a lot of users, the best approach will be a
connection pool using a middle tier application.
or
Have 4 or 5 servers and use replication for syncing the data between then.
see you !
--
Alexandre Benson Smith
Development
THOR Software e Comercial Ltda.
Santo Andre - Sao Paulo - Brazil
www.thorsoftware.com.br
>--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, "Nigel Weeks" <nweeks@e...>Eduardo,
>wrote:
>
>
>>if($processor_count > 1){
>> $best_architecture_for_job = "Classic";
>>}
>>
>>SuperServer will be more scalable, but it's still in the works.
>>
>>
>
>Nigel, Would love to go that way to Classic but, ...
>
>will I run out of resources with so many potential users?
>
>Is there a limit at which you should go SS and not Classic?
>
>Is there a limit at which we need to consider a different architecture?
>
>Thanks!
>
>-Eduardo
>
>
I had never deployed a system for a thousand users, I think the maximum
I have are around 100-150 concurrent users.
I think, when you have a lot of users, the best approach will be a
connection pool using a middle tier application.
or
Have 4 or 5 servers and use replication for syncing the data between then.
see you !
--
Alexandre Benson Smith
Development
THOR Software e Comercial Ltda.
Santo Andre - Sao Paulo - Brazil
www.thorsoftware.com.br