Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Store Blobs in Seperate Tables? |
---|---|
Author | Aage Johansen |
Post date | 2005-08-04T19:27:33Z |
Shaq wrote:
should be able to find many discussions on this in the archives for the
Firebird lists.
Keeping images in the database works fine. However, depending on a lot of
things, it might be more convenient to store them outside of the database
(I use both methods). There is no "best" method for every case.
--
Aage J.
> Is it best to store blobs in a seperate table? Does it increaseWhichever approach you choose, there are positives and negatives. You
> performance any or is it negligible? I am storing photos from a web
> camera which are about 340k uncompressed in size.
>
should be able to find many discussions on this in the archives for the
Firebird lists.
Keeping images in the database works fine. However, depending on a lot of
things, it might be more convenient to store them outside of the database
(I use both methods). There is no "best" method for every case.
--
Aage J.