| Subject | Commit Retaining Transactions | 
|---|---|
| Author | Ruaan Barnard | 
| Post date | 2005-08-02T09:22:33Z | 
Hi
 
I am trying to find the best solution for a long running transaction.
 
What would be the best solution of the 2 methods I describe and why or why
not?
 
1] Use 2 transactions - one for read and one for write and commit the write
transaction every 100 records or
 
2] Use 1 transaction with CommitRetaining every 100 records and a hard
Commit at the end.
 
Any other suggestions would also be welcome
 
TIA
 
Ruaan
 
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
            I am trying to find the best solution for a long running transaction.
What would be the best solution of the 2 methods I describe and why or why
not?
1] Use 2 transactions - one for read and one for write and commit the write
transaction every 100 records or
2] Use 1 transaction with CommitRetaining every 100 records and a hard
Commit at the end.
Any other suggestions would also be welcome
TIA
Ruaan
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]