Subject | Firebird Usage Load Problem |
---|---|
Author | Maurice Ling |
Post date | 2005-07-14T06:00:23Z |
Hi everyone,
I need help here.
I've been battling with my system administrator on Firebird CPU load,
apparently, it is exceedingly high. I am using CS on Red Hat Linux on a
cluster. The script that uses Firebird is in Python, using KinterbasDB.
I've ran my script for a few minutes and using "top", this is my
comparison of load...
29381 mling 15 0 48648 44m 2980 S 1.7 1.1 0:32.24 python
29383 firebird 20 0 289m 74m 10m R 83.6 1.8 3:46.62 fb_inet_server
The script only runs using 1.7% CPU but fb_inet_server uses 83.6% CPU. I
can understand if FB's CPU usage is in spikes during DB access but it is
not, 0:32.24 python versus 3:46.62 fb_inet_server.
Any idea what may be happening?
Page size is 4KB and buffer is set to 65365 (I cannot go any higher).
If I run multiple scripts, I can use 3x99.9% CPU for the whole day and
I'm having hell from my system administrator.
Please help.
Cheers
Maurice
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I need help here.
I've been battling with my system administrator on Firebird CPU load,
apparently, it is exceedingly high. I am using CS on Red Hat Linux on a
cluster. The script that uses Firebird is in Python, using KinterbasDB.
I've ran my script for a few minutes and using "top", this is my
comparison of load...
29381 mling 15 0 48648 44m 2980 S 1.7 1.1 0:32.24 python
29383 firebird 20 0 289m 74m 10m R 83.6 1.8 3:46.62 fb_inet_server
The script only runs using 1.7% CPU but fb_inet_server uses 83.6% CPU. I
can understand if FB's CPU usage is in spikes during DB access but it is
not, 0:32.24 python versus 3:46.62 fb_inet_server.
Any idea what may be happening?
Page size is 4KB and buffer is set to 65365 (I cannot go any higher).
If I run multiple scripts, I can use 3x99.9% CPU for the whole day and
I'm having hell from my system administrator.
Please help.
Cheers
Maurice
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]