Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Firebird & cluster |
---|---|
Author | Ann W. Harrison |
Post date | 2005-06-29T21:44:26Z |
Yves Glodt wrote:
manager may prove to be a workable solution. At the moment, none of the
developers has a system that we can use to test it, and making it work
will be non-trivial I'm sure, so it's not likely to be addressed
immediately.
Ann
>yes, I think that's right, though the open source distributed lock
> We intensively queried our 4GB database from 8 connections (thus 8
> fb_inet_server processes were running). But, then we ended up with
> freezes (kernel panic), even once of the complete cluster. (It consists
> of one master and one node atm, running clusterknoppix.) So for now we
> forget the idea of FB on a cluster...
manager may prove to be a workable solution. At the moment, none of the
developers has a system that we can use to test it, and making it work
will be non-trivial I'm sure, so it's not likely to be addressed
immediately.
>Not without a distributed lock manager.
> As I read Vulcan plans to introduce strong SMP capabilities. Will it
> also be able to run in a cluster?
> Or is the preferable way to use big (8 or 16 CPUs) SMP machines in caseYes.
> where huge load is expected?
>Regards,
Ann