Hi,

At June 27, 2005, 20:55, Robert martin wrote:

> Totally Agree Nigel. When I made the decision to use SS it was based on
> a doc that said SS was the Future of FB. The names also enhance that,
> Super Server sounds grunty, Classic Server sounds 'OLD and reliable'.

Both names were inherited from Borland. And, Classic Server is based
on the original Interbase architecture, before Borland bought
Interbase.

Also, both architectures have their place, even once FB 3 is out with
SMP support in SS. Apparently, Classic Server is a good starting point
to implement cluster support, either for FB 3 or a in a future version.

--
Best regards,
Daniel Rail
Senior Software Developer
ACCRA Consultants Inc. (www.accra.ca)
ACCRA Med Software Inc. (www.filopto.com)