Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Re: Database file grows |
---|---|
Author | Daniel Rail |
Post date | 2005-06-21T16:58:51Z |
Hi,
At June 21, 2005, 10:42, lsbtreis wrote:
the risk of causing a database corruption.
will be faster than GBAK and will provide a backup file that can be
used as a database. At the moment don't ask when will Firebird 2.0
will be officially released, it's still in Alpha.
--
Best regards,
Daniel Rail
Senior Software Developer
ACCRA Consultants Inc. (www.accra.ca)
ACCRA Med Software Inc. (www.filopto.com)
At June 21, 2005, 10:42, lsbtreis wrote:
>> Bottom line - I would definitely change my procedure to NOT copyIf you mean by simply doing a straight file copy, then there is always
> the
>> database. I would back it up using gbak. Only take the db offline
> when you
>> want to restore from a backup.
>>
> Are there no risks of doing backup while the database is in use?
the risk of causing a database corruption.
> The problema about using gbak is that it can take too long andWith Firebird 2.0, there's a new backup utility called NBACKUP that
> during that time my clients can't get the information they need.
will be faster than GBAK and will provide a backup file that can be
used as a database. At the moment don't ask when will Firebird 2.0
will be officially released, it's still in Alpha.
--
Best regards,
Daniel Rail
Senior Software Developer
ACCRA Consultants Inc. (www.accra.ca)
ACCRA Med Software Inc. (www.filopto.com)