Subject | Difference between SS and CS on Windows with disconnected clients |
---|---|
Author | Bob Murdoch |
Post date | 2005-06-10T13:43:51Z |
If my memory is correct, it seems that forcibly closing a client
connected to SS on Windows is nearly immediately detected by the FB
server. I have seen situations where a client with a runaway query
was causing near 100% cpu usage. When this client was killed, the
server returned to normal almost immediately.
I have observed, however, that on CS, the fb_inet_server process never
stops (meaning memory and cpu usage still high), even though the
calling client has disconnected.
Two questions -
1. Are my observations correct?
2. Is it safe to kill the fb_inet_server process in this case?
tia,
Bob M..
connected to SS on Windows is nearly immediately detected by the FB
server. I have seen situations where a client with a runaway query
was causing near 100% cpu usage. When this client was killed, the
server returned to normal almost immediately.
I have observed, however, that on CS, the fb_inet_server process never
stops (meaning memory and cpu usage still high), even though the
calling client has disconnected.
Two questions -
1. Are my observations correct?
2. Is it safe to kill the fb_inet_server process in this case?
tia,
Bob M..