Subject RE: [firebird-support] CS restore much, much faster than SS?
Author Bob Murdoch
Pavel,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pavel Cisar [mailto:pcisar@...]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 4:04 AM
>
> I suppose you have used local connection? Then no wonder it's
> faster with Classic, because when local connection is used,
> classic is loaded directly into address space of client
> process, thus there is no overhead in data transfer between
> address spaces of different processes. And restore means a
> lot of data to transfer :-)

What would the command line look like for a 'local connection'?

I currently use gbak -c <backup file> <server:restore file>

I tried changing <server:restore file> to just <restore file>, but
gbak failed.

tia,

Bob M..