Subject | RE: [firebird-support] CS restore much, much faster than SS? |
---|---|
Author | Bob Murdoch |
Post date | 2005-06-01T12:26:05Z |
Pavel,
I currently use gbak -c <backup file> <server:restore file>
I tried changing <server:restore file> to just <restore file>, but
gbak failed.
tia,
Bob M..
> -----Original Message-----What would the command line look like for a 'local connection'?
> From: Pavel Cisar [mailto:pcisar@...]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 4:04 AM
>
> I suppose you have used local connection? Then no wonder it's
> faster with Classic, because when local connection is used,
> classic is loaded directly into address space of client
> process, thus there is no overhead in data transfer between
> address spaces of different processes. And restore means a
> lot of data to transfer :-)
I currently use gbak -c <backup file> <server:restore file>
I tried changing <server:restore file> to just <restore file>, but
gbak failed.
tia,
Bob M..