Alexandre Benson Smith wrote:

> Every time I think I have a good idea the more experiencied people tend
> to show me a lot of drawbacks :-) and I just think how I can't imagine
> how FB works and the lot of things that should be done to make it
> consistent/confiable.

*haha* Happens all the time but suddenly you actually come up with
something new and really useful.

> So I don't have a clue if it's easy or good to have diferent image for
> memory and disk representation of the pages, or even if it's possible.
>
> Ann and other's, for sure, will clarify your doubts.

Well... That would be nice and interesting. But I'd just like to make
clear: I don't have any doubts about the Firebird implementation, I'm
not requesting anything, and I'm not saying I know better than anyone
else. I'm just curios about how this is done inside FB, why (for
example, has this kind of caching even been considered?), if there are
any plans to change it in the forseable future, and if so how and why,
etc. :-)

Kjell
--
--------------------------------------
Kjell Rilbe
Adressmarknaden AM AB
E-post: kjell.rilbe@...
Telefon: 08-761 06 55
Mobil: 0733-44 24 64