Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Best performance |
---|---|
Author | Martijn Tonies |
Post date | 2005-05-03T19:01:36Z |
Hello,
one that gives you the best performance.
Given that you did not create any indices or keys, I suspect performance
(on non-empty tables with a substantial number of rows) is bad in either
case.
With regards,
Martijn Tonies
Database Workbench - developer tool for InterBase, Firebird, MySQL & MS SQL
Server
Upscene Productions
http://www.upscene.com
> If my data base has a table that is related with ten other tables and,Well, basically, the one that gives you the best performance is the
> in each one of these ten tables exists one field that I have that to
> show together in a consultation with the first table. What of this two
> options goes to give the best performance?
one that gives you the best performance.
Given that you did not create any indices or keys, I suspect performance
(on non-empty tables with a substantial number of rows) is bad in either
case.
With regards,
Martijn Tonies
Database Workbench - developer tool for InterBase, Firebird, MySQL & MS SQL
Server
Upscene Productions
http://www.upscene.com