Subject | ib_util_malloc vs malloc |
---|---|
Author | rayholme |
Post date | 2005-03-20T13:48:04Z |
In Helen's excellent tome, she says one must use ib_util_malloc in UDF
land.
I have been using my own flavor of malloc for years (standard malloc
which forces things to 128 byte boundaries due to problems with
various OS-s). It works fine in the current firebird 1.5.2 udf land
and FREE_IT seems content. However I would like to be sure that I am
not violating some secret in the server and that FREE_IT works healthily.
Any comments and/or warnings from developers appreciated.
;=]
land.
I have been using my own flavor of malloc for years (standard malloc
which forces things to 128 byte boundaries due to problems with
various OS-s). It works fine in the current firebird 1.5.2 udf land
and FREE_IT seems content. However I would like to be sure that I am
not violating some secret in the server and that FREE_IT works healthily.
Any comments and/or warnings from developers appreciated.
;=]