> Insanity. And will broke the requisite of having a
> simulation per database, and just one enciclopedic
> database. So the customer will not be happy at all.
>
> It's a requisite that MSSQL can cope. If a FIrebird
> implementation have a chance to happen, it's only
> after having the server side multi-db queries implemented.
>
> On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 19:31:07 +1100, Alan McDonald wrote:
>
> >
> >>
> >> This is really my #1 on the wishlist....
> >>
> >> On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:18:38 +1100, Helen Borrie wrote:
> >
> >
> >all you need to do is get over this need to have separate DBs (often a
> >leftover habit of desktop database environments) - just
> normalise your data
> >and put it all together... if they're on the same machine they
> should be in
> >the same file....
> >Alan

yes - there are real constraints to the idea of one monolithic database.
There are also people who are not famliar with the benefits either.
Alan