Subject | Re: [firebird-support] 60 chars in a 50 field |
---|---|
Author | Kjell Rilbe |
Post date | 2005-02-25T16:29:05Z |
Thomas Miller wrote:
not "insiders".
Is there anyone in this forum who's not an insider who would need
backwards compatibility in this respect?
Just trying to get *some* kind of indication...
Thanks,
Kjell
--
--------------------------------------
Kjell Rilbe
Adressmarknaden AM AB
E-post: kjell.rilbe@...
Telefon: 08-761 06 55
Mobil: 0733-44 24 64
> This is clearly a bug. I think one of the things that the next ODS needSo far this seems to be the consensus among forum participants who are
> to do is store char
> length and byte length. If it is already doing this, then the engine
> has a bug in it for not
> checking both. If you are going to ignore the Char length, then lets
> change SQL and
> drop VARCHAR and CHAR and replace them with BYTECHAR.
>
> If someone has relied on a bug in the engine, their problem.
not "insiders".
Is there anyone in this forum who's not an insider who would need
backwards compatibility in this respect?
Just trying to get *some* kind of indication...
Thanks,
Kjell
--
--------------------------------------
Kjell Rilbe
Adressmarknaden AM AB
E-post: kjell.rilbe@...
Telefon: 08-761 06 55
Mobil: 0733-44 24 64