| Subject | RE: [firebird-support] Does 1.5 Classic on Windows suffer from the HT problem? |
|---|---|
| Author | Bob Murdoch |
| Post date | 2005-02-23T19:04:17Z |
Chris,
dual cpu's and HT enabled (looks like 4 cpu's). You do not want to do
anything with CPU Affinity. Let each FB process run on the CPU it is
assigned.
The only thing you will want to do when switching from SS to CS is
perhaps change the buffers. Otherwise, each connection (process in
CS) will default to something like 75MB of RAM. I chose 2048 for the
buffer setting, and it's worked well (gfix -b 2048 -user sysdba
-password masterkey <database>).
Bob M..
> -----Original Message-----I've had wonderful success with Classic on a Windows 2003 server, with
> From: cg_bland [mailto:chris.bland@...]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 2:29 PM
>
> Finally, if things go ahead, we will be deploying Windows
> Classic in a production environment. We are testing at the
> moment - however, has anyone else had good/bad experiences
> with Windows Classic?
dual cpu's and HT enabled (looks like 4 cpu's). You do not want to do
anything with CPU Affinity. Let each FB process run on the CPU it is
assigned.
The only thing you will want to do when switching from SS to CS is
perhaps change the buffers. Otherwise, each connection (process in
CS) will default to something like 75MB of RAM. I chose 2048 for the
buffer setting, and it's worked well (gfix -b 2048 -user sysdba
-password masterkey <database>).
Bob M..