Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Re: rtf-to-plaintext udf? |
---|---|
Author | Urs Liska |
Post date | 2005-02-01T21:33:52Z |
andrew_s_vaz schrieb:
that's what I'll probably do. This way I can at least enforce any app
programmer to fill a second field and to look up documentation as for
what this field is for...
Urs
>Thanks Andrew,
> Urs,
>
> Don't know if this helps or if it has been said already, but I have a
> very similar situation in one of my apps. The solution that I applied
> was to make a other blob field with *always* plain text in it. So,
> whatever was saved at the field with RTF, the app also saved a copy of
> everything as PlainText at this other field at the same moment.
>
> HTH
> Andrew
>
>
that's what I'll probably do. This way I can at least enforce any app
programmer to fill a second field and to look up documentation as for
what this field is for...
Urs