Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Re: FB users can do too much by default |
---|---|
Author | Vlada Macek |
Post date | 2005-11-10T12:10:56Z |
[At 10.11.2005 12:45, Martijn Tonies kindly sent the following quotation.]
None) and all dbs are listed in aliases.conf and reside in one place.
And more, each db is named after the user. I like simple schemes and
security by obscurity (being the only one security layer available)
_does_not_work_.
Also Si mentioned Vulcan, but as I see it, that is still security by
obscurity ("users wouln't know what databases are available").
--
\//\/\
(Sometimes credited as 1494 F8DD 6379 4CD7 E7E3 1FC9 D750 4243 1F05 9424.)
>> If so, I find it very sad. I'm rooting a linux box with severalSure they will, I've disabled the free file locations (DatabaseAccess =
>> independent users and now, how can I give them access to their own
>> relational databases when they would be able to not even peek at
>> other people's dbs, but also create tables there?
>
> Well, for starters, do they even know those databases (and their file
> locations?) exist? :-)
None) and all dbs are listed in aliases.conf and reside in one place.
And more, each db is named after the user. I like simple schemes and
security by obscurity (being the only one security layer available)
_does_not_work_.
Also Si mentioned Vulcan, but as I see it, that is still security by
obscurity ("users wouln't know what databases are available").
--
\//\/\
(Sometimes credited as 1494 F8DD 6379 4CD7 E7E3 1FC9 D750 4243 1F05 9424.)