Not here, please. Take it to Firebird-general.

^ heLen


At 10:44 PM 8/11/2005 +0000, Noel Cosgrave wrote:

>Yes, it is OT, and I would have replied to you directly if I could, so as to
>keep the signal to noise ratio in the group on the right side of good.
>
>As a DB developer, I use both Firebird and PostgreSQL, and I consider that
>each has it's niche. I have to agree that in terms of documentation,
>PostgreSQL is streets ahead. However, why not take something positive from
>such comments and use them as a basis for building a better Firebird in the
>future? For what it is worth, I have issues with the way PostgreSQL works,
>and in particular the way table inheritance is implemented.
>
>Anyway, I'm curious. Do you care to enumerate those features that FB has had
>for a long time that have only recently been introduced to PostgreSQL (apart
>from native Win32 capability)?