> > > Huh, there is? That's news ... where did you get that info?
> > >
> >
> > >From Helen. She said we cannot assume that things always get executed
> > in the sequence you expect in the db...
>
> Well, I guess this makes sense a bit when you have multiple
> connections ... given the timeswitching for threads in the
> server and all.

Wait, incorrect ... given that the two statements are not executed
-at the same time- but one after another...

I guess this only would make sense is several machines are hitting
the server at the same time. Although I do think that if one action
is committed, every other thread should see it ...


With regards,

Martijn Tonies
Database Workbench - tool for InterBase, Firebird, MySQL, Oracle & MS SQL
Server
Upscene Productions
http://www.upscene.com
Database development questions? Check the forum!
http://www.databasedevelopmentforum.com