Subject Re: Active transactions (benchmark results - updated)
Author k_smith_000
--- In, Alexandre Benson Smith
>And we should increase the default lock table
>size and the default hash table width - those were designed for
>computers of the 1980's, where every byte of memory counted. Sigh.

# Tune lock hash list; more hash slots mean shorter hash chains.
I don't get this :(
#Only necessary under very high load.
#Prime number values are recommended.
This one is clear;)
# Type: integer
#LockHashSlots = 101
Has anyone played with this parameter?

>And we should increase the default lock table size
"In Classic mode, the size given is used for the initial allocation.
The table expands dynamically up to the limit of memory."
I'm using CS so this one is not for me;)

Best wishes,
Kevin Smith