Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Windows O/S Config for 50-user system |
---|---|
Author | Lester Caine |
Post date | 2005-01-20T08:10:01Z |
Helen
I'd always understood that XP was simply not licence to be used a s a
server, you needed 2003 for that, but from what you are saying ( again
needs checking on a country by country basis :( ) It is only Microsoft's
'server' functions that are restricted?
Not that I want to hear that ;) I'm using it as a reason to get
customers to consider Linux, and no one has corrected me yet :)
At the end of the day, I think a dedicated Linux machine will be better
than a dedicated XP machine ?
--
Lester Caine
-----------------------------
L.S.Caine Electronic Services
I'd always understood that XP was simply not licence to be used a s a
server, you needed 2003 for that, but from what you are saying ( again
needs checking on a country by country basis :( ) It is only Microsoft's
'server' functions that are restricted?
Not that I want to hear that ;) I'm using it as a reason to get
customers to consider Linux, and no one has corrected me yet :)
At the end of the day, I think a dedicated Linux machine will be better
than a dedicated XP machine ?
--
Lester Caine
-----------------------------
L.S.Caine Electronic Services