Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Classic process priority |
---|---|
Author | JD FitzGerald |
Post date | 2005-01-14T17:28:12Z |
Ivan Prenosil wrote:
priority as other apps running on the machine.
is broken into sub-procedures already, although they really have to be
executed together.
The lowered priority of the app is working, but I'm still worried incase
the owners of the box decide to put something cpu heavy on it.
> If the application is hogging the cpu, wouldn't it be betterThis is what I've done already, but I'd like the app to have the same
> to decrease app priority instead of increase Firebird priority ?
>
priority as other apps running on the machine.
> Also, did not your stored procedure make lot of updates ?Nope on the updates and RAM usage isn't particularly high. The procedure
> It would use lot of RAM for undo-log, which can slow down
> everything considerably. Can you split SP to several smaller pieces
> that can be executed separtely ? (or just process smaller number
> of records at once).
is broken into sub-procedures already, although they really have to be
executed together.
The lowered priority of the app is working, but I'm still worried incase
the owners of the box decide to put something cpu heavy on it.