At 02:04 PM 7/9/2004, Myles Wakeham wrote:

>Now the key factor in all of this design work is that the multiple
>connection pools in the application can asynchronously connect to Firebird,
>and execute queries, manage cursors and fetch data back. From what I
>understand you are saying, this is not the case - it won't work.

If I said that, I was suffering from too much personal asynchronous
tasking. Your design sounds fine.

> > Connections aren't all that expensive and would save you a lot
> > of synchronization.
>
>Well if creating 500-1000 connections to a Firebird Server isn't a big deal,
>then maybe I'm over engineering this for no return.

500 isn't so bad. 1000 is over the top. Use the connection pooling
idea.

Regards,


Ann