Subject | Re: [firebird-support] short transactions |
---|---|
Author | Dimitry Sibiryakov |
Post date | 2004-07-07T05:11:29Z |
On 6 Jul 2004 at 22:43, Faultier wrote:
high hopes there. This is one of them. Commit retaining works not so
good as it had been expected. Use it only if you've got no choice.
SY, Dimitry Sibiryakov.
>everybody here say, keep your transactions as short as possible andBorland documentation is just a beta. There is a lot of bugs and
>don't leave them opened. But in the API documentation of IB6 on page
>75, I found a hint, which says, it is better to start a transaction
>for every user and use isc_commit_retaining(), than closing and
>starting a new transaction with isc_commit_transaction().
high hopes there. This is one of them. Commit retaining works not so
good as it had been expected. Use it only if you've got no choice.
SY, Dimitry Sibiryakov.