Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Interbase / Firebird and SAN/NAS |
---|---|
Author | Jonathan Neve |
Post date | 2004-04-29T06:16:15Z |
Thanks for the information!
Damian Dowling wrote:
I can't even conceive of needing this sort of thing (and neither can my
customers), not to mention the budget!!
Sounds interresting though.
Thanks!
Jonathan Neve.
Damian Dowling wrote:
>A Server Attached Network (SAN) is a RAID in an external box attached toWow! We really live in two different worlds! :-)
>the server typically via a fibre optic network. This network is used just
>for the servers storage hence the name.
>
>For example, where i work we have two RAID 5 arrays each with 1TB, a
>external controller mirrors the Array Boxes. The SAN Controller is then
>connected to the server, which just sees a 1TB SCSI Hard Drive on its system.
>
>The main advantage to a SAN is huge storage (up to 32TB), redundancy using
>extra controllers (very expensive) and off site storage. Here the mirriored
>Array boxes are stored at different ends of the building in case of file.
>In fact the controller, server, and array boxes can be up to 3Km from each
>other.
>
>
I can't even conceive of needing this sort of thing (and neither can my
customers), not to mention the budget!!
Sounds interresting though.
Thanks!
Jonathan Neve.