Christian G|tter wrote:

>>I don't believe W98 will use any more than 64Mb, that was
>>oodles when it was released, or perhaps it's just that only
>>the first 64Mb is managed - I forget which :)
>
> this is not true. Windows 98 can use 256 MB of RAM.
> It can also be run with more RAM, but it would only
> use 256 MB.

OK I stand corrected - it's above 512Mb it will not boot with :)
You don't get much speed improvement over 64Mb, unlike W2k
( Now what was the limit for Win3.1 ;) )

--
Lester Caine
-----------------------------
L.S.Caine Electronic Services