Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Did I reached the boundaries of |
---|---|
Author | Robert |
Post date | 2004-03-27T11:46:30Z |
Hi Helen,
machine), where there is only one firebird.msg in the firebird directory.
The creation date of the message file is the same as the other files coming
with WI-V1.5.0.4290 Firebird 1.5.
Both messages exist in de message file so i'm now sure it is from firebird
and not from ibx or something.
I use a lot of nested views with subqueries in the select clause and also a
lot of left joins. I think i reached a limit where the engine get confused
and throws these nonsense error messages.
I will examine the rdb$db_key now as suggested by Arno.
Robert.
> At 12:09 PM 26/03/2004 +0100, you wrote:that
> >Hi,
> >I receive a -901 "cannot sort on a field that does not exist" or a -151
> >"attemted update of read-only column" when i execute a SELECT statement
> >uses views with a lot subqueries.SELECT's
> >
> >The messages doesnot make sense (for me). For the -901 occurs for
> >without ORDER clause (so nothing to sort) and the -151 error occurs forjust
> >a SELECT-satement (so nothing to update).The errors also occurs on a standalone PC (server and client on the same
>
> You have *some* sort of error, but it looks as though you are using the
> wrong message file. Client and server should have firebird.msg with the
> same build number as the engine - the client should have the same build
> number too.
machine), where there is only one firebird.msg in the firebird directory.
The creation date of the message file is the same as the other files coming
with WI-V1.5.0.4290 Firebird 1.5.
Both messages exist in de message file so i'm now sure it is from firebird
and not from ibx or something.
I use a lot of nested views with subqueries in the select clause and also a
lot of left joins. I think i reached a limit where the engine get confused
and throws these nonsense error messages.
I will examine the rdb$db_key now as suggested by Arno.
Robert.
>
> /hb