Subject Re: [firebird-support] Re: Access to securitydatabase
Author Daniel Rail

At March 10, 2004, 18:47, Eric-Jan wrote:

> I see that the discussion on Sourgeforge is much more fundamental. I
> only hope the implementation will not be burried in all sorts of nice
> to have things. Security is a serious business.

The review for change for security is in the to-do list for Firebird
2.0, and the discussion is well related to that. So, any comments on
the subject is welcomed.

Best regards,
Daniel Rail
Senior System Engineer
ACCRA Group Inc. (
ACCRA Med Software Inc. (