Subject | Re: [firebird-support] More on over-sweeping |
---|---|
Author | Ivan Prenosil |
Post date | 2004-03-09T10:56:42Z |
I have different advice - instead of listening chaotic advices, study how multigeneration
architecture (and garbage collection, sweep, etc.) works and make your own opinion.
(Some keywords you may want to search for in archives: sweep, garbage collection,
OIT, OAT, TIP, Ann Harrison, Jim Starkey, David Schnepper, Charlie Caro, ...)
Ivan
architecture (and garbage collection, sweep, etc.) works and make your own opinion.
(Some keywords you may want to search for in archives: sweep, garbage collection,
OIT, OAT, TIP, Ann Harrison, Jim Starkey, David Schnepper, Charlie Caro, ...)
Ivan
----- Original Message -----
From: "JS.staff" <jsparrow@...>
To: <firebird-support@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 11:19 AM
Subject: [firebird-support] More on over-sweeping
> This is the sweeping advice I was given:
>
> =============
>
> "frequent sweeping will delay transaction start-up, as the time since
> the last sweep increases, the time for transaction startup will also
> increase.
> this can all be avoided by more frequent back/restore and less frequent
> sweeping."
>
> ...
>
> "Only if you CAN'T do timely backup/restore operations AND your
> application results in large numbers of rolled back transactions, you
> should do sweeps, but do not do them frequently."
>
> ...
>
> "You can reduce DB peformance significatnly by sweeping too regularly.
> You are much better off doing a backup/restore cycle. If you do know
> that a seeep is unnecessary then don't do it. (certainly not every
> night)
> that's my understanding - it's not a matter of belt-and-braces, it's a
> retrograde step for overall performance"
>
> ===============
>
> Comments? ;)
>
> John