Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Shadow files and raid arrays |
---|---|
Author | Jim McKay |
Post date | 2004-03-02T04:16:46Z |
Hello Bob Murdoch:
======= At 2004-03-01, 22:12:00 Bob Murdoch wrote: =======
If you're using IDE, I've had *very* good experience
w/ several of HighPoint's Raid controllers:
http://www.highpoint-tech.com/home.htm
Although it *totally* transgresses my sensabilities,
I've read good reviews on M$'s native software RAID.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Best regards.
Jim McKay
JMcKay@...
2004-03-01 20:09:46
--
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 7.0.225 / Virus Database: 261.9.15 - Release Date: 3/1/2004
======= At 2004-03-01, 22:12:00 Bob Murdoch wrote: =======
>My question is - does shadowing on a raid array offer us anything? MyYup! That's about it. *Must be* level 5 for benefits you describe.
>understanding is that the benefit of a shadow is if the drive that the db
>is on fails, the shadow on another drive can take over. In the case of a
>raid array, data is spread across drives, so one drive failing is
>accomodated at the raid level.
If you're using IDE, I've had *very* good experience
w/ several of HighPoint's Raid controllers:
http://www.highpoint-tech.com/home.htm
Although it *totally* transgresses my sensabilities,
I've read good reviews on M$'s native software RAID.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Best regards.
Jim McKay
JMcKay@...
2004-03-01 20:09:46
--
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 7.0.225 / Virus Database: 261.9.15 - Release Date: 3/1/2004